I noticed only a brief mention of nuclear energy. Why is that? I mean, why not present nuclear as a viable alternative to fossil? I guess that's for another post?
Thanks for the reply and links to your previous writing on the nuclear topic. I'll read them soon. Regarding nuclear as a viable energy option, I guess each so-called developing country is also in the process of developing a robust humanitarian political/legal system. So access to nuclear technology might present issues about nuclear weapons.
I noticed only a brief mention of nuclear energy. Why is that? I mean, why not present nuclear as a viable alternative to fossil? I guess that's for another post?
Yeah, probably because I have been banging that drum too often already. ;-) See here, my very first post! https://open.substack.com/pub/maartenboudry/p/why-environmentalists-pose-a-bigger?utm_source=post&comments=true&utm_medium=web I totally agree that nuclear is a viable alternative, but if you're a developing country, you can't just leap-frog to nuclear at once. Fossil fuels are a great stepping stone to industrialize and then switch to nuclear.
Thanks for the reply and links to your previous writing on the nuclear topic. I'll read them soon. Regarding nuclear as a viable energy option, I guess each so-called developing country is also in the process of developing a robust humanitarian political/legal system. So access to nuclear technology might present issues about nuclear weapons.